justice2kb
       

 

Kill
(CPA's 659 entanglement 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97)

No one recognizes the accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 and this messenger is killed for trying to get it recognized.

An accounting entanglement as the term is used here is confusion intentionally planted in the accounting. Whoever controls the accounting entanglement controls the people and assets that are entangled. Entanglements are used as a wedge and takeover tool and as cover. Small numbers are used to make the issue appear insignificant. The issue is not the amount. The issue is that they entangle . One indicator of their importance is the amount of effort gone to to prevent them from being recognized.

The simplest example is 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97. It was created by the CPA Joanne Barnes reporting different numbers to different entities when the numbers should be the same. In the Trust accounting the CPA reported 1,475.95 for the Court and 816.00 for the IRS when the numbers should be the same. In the Estate accounting she reported the difference of 659.97 to the Count and the IRS. If you can recognize the dynamics in 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 you can recognize the same dynamics in the far more complicated examples. Such as the other entanglements I am being framed with in Edward White's letter of May 19, 1992.

Let the CPA's 659 entanglement represent all the CPA's entanglemnts described in the Attorney's letter of May 19, 1992, and all the CPA'sentanglements covering the accounting trails in our Mother's Estate at bk467p191. GOOD

The accounting entanglement 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 can be used as a reality test:

$659.97
(1)  Does 1,475.97 less 816.00 equal 659.97?  (yes)
(2)  Did the Commissioner of Accounts approve these numbers? (yes)
(3)  Does anyone recognize the accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 or any accounting trail for any of these numbers? (no)
(4)  If 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 is not recognized, does it still exist? (yes)
(5)  If the messenger is killed does 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 still exist? (yes)

$545,820 disappears
(6)  Was a cash payment of $545,820 made to the Estate on April 21, 1992? (yes)
(7)  Was it recorded in the accounting? (no)
(8)   Does anyone recognize that it was not recorded? (no)
(9)  If the $545,820 payment is not recognized was it still made? (yes)
(10)  If the messenger is killed was the $545,820 payment still made? (yes)
(11)  Is money supposed to disappear? (no)
(12)  Do the accountants have approximately total control and approximately no accountability? (yes)
(13)  Is the public powerless against them? (yes)

Outline

(1) The 659 entanglement is created by the CPA Joanne Barnes and the Attorney Edward White

(2) They frame the Trustee Anthony O'Connell with the 659 entanglement.

(3) The Trustee asks the Commissioner of Accounts for help with it in his 12th account. No Commisioner does not respond.

(4) The Trustee asks the Judges for help.

(5) The Commisioner responds with a Report to the Judges. The Report misrepresents the Trustee's 12th account and closes the Trust Account by altering the Trustee's 11th account.

(6) The Trustee files an Exceptions to the Commissioner's Report. The Exceptions disappears.

(7) The Trustee posts his web site http://www.canweconnectthedots.com to try to expose the accounting.

(8) The Trustee is sent Court Orders, Motions, and a summons.

(9) The Trustee is removed as Trustee.

* * *

(1992.12.03 (bar) Does my letter to the Bar mentions

(0) 1992.04.22 enclosure with "

(1) 1992.05.19   Attorney frames Trustee with CPA's  659 entanglement. (1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97)  May19-2p

"2. The K-1 filed by the Trust showed a payment of $816.00 in interest to the estate. You sent a check in the amount of $1475.97 to the estate. What was the remaining $659.97? Do I have this confused with the tax debt/credit situation which ran from the Third Accounting?"
(Attorney Edward White to Trustee, Anthony O'Connell, in part)


(2) 1993.03.20 and 1993.10.04  Commissioner of Accounts Jesse Wilson approves CPA's  659 entanglement.  659trail-9p

"Int fm Harold O'Connell Trust  ......................................... 816.00 "(Estate accounting at bk467p192)
"Debt fm Harold O’Connell Trust ...................................... 659.97 "(Estate accounting at bk467p192)
"Payable to the Estate of Jean M. O'Connell ... ... .... ... $ 1,475.97" (Trust accounting at bk480p1768)
(Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson, III, approved accounting trails, in part)


(3) 1999.08.09  Trustee asks Commissioner of Accounts Jesse Wilson for help in exposing the CPA's 659 entanglement.  12th , 12th22p

Do any of you have the power to compel the CPA (firm) and the lawyer to:
1. Explain why they created this $659.97 debt.
2. Explain why I am made to appear responsible for it.
3. Show exactly where this $ 659.97 debt is now.
4. Pay the $ 659.97 back from the estate to the trust.
5.  Do it without inflicting anymore cost and conflict on any member of my family.

(Trustee's 12th account to Commission of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson, III, in part)


(4 ) 2000.07.24   Trustee 12th account

asks the Judges for help in exposing the CPA's accounting.

A CPA-lawyer fraud operation stole money from the Estate of Jean M. O'Connell. I would like to (1) find out how much money they stole, (2) recover the stolen money, and (3) free the real estate from their controlling accounting entanglements. Because they use an innocent family member to unwittingly carry out their agenda, the traditional paths of justice through the Court won't work. The direct intervention of a Judge is the last hope in the system. If you could (1) protect all the member's of Jean M. O'Connell's family from further damage, and (2) compel a 100% true and complete financial disclosure of her Estate, with one hard copy in my hands, you could expose an otherwise untouchable fraud operation.
(Anthony O'Connell to the Judges of the Nineteenth Circuit Court) (Copy to Joanne Barnes, Edward White, Allison May, Jesse Wilson, Henry Mackall, Peter Arntson, SEC, IRS, the Virginia Bar, Jean Nader and Sheila O'Connell, in part)
 judges2000  , judges2000-131p


(5) 2000.08.08  Commissioner of Accounts Jesse Wilson closes the Trust Account by making the Trustee's 1995 11th account a "final account".  report12th , report12th20p


"5. The said trustee has also filed a Twelfth Account in which he reports as an asset $659.97 "due from the Estate of Jean M. OConnell".  A copy of that "account" is enclosed herewith as Exhibit 3.
6. The Estate of Jean M. OConnell, deceased, Fiduciary No. 49160, was closed in the Commissioner of Accounts office after approval of a Final Account on May 31, 1994.
7. The said $659.97 was the subject of correspondence between the said trustee and Edward J. White, attorney and co-executor of the estate of Jean M. OConnell, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits 4 and 5. In his letter, Exhibit 5, the trustee explains that the $659.97 is part of a net income payment of $1,475.97 which the trust owed the estate of Jean M. OConnell. In that same letter, the trustee states that "At this point in time, I believe Mr. Balderson and I are of one mind that the estate does not owe the trust and the trust does not owe the estate".
Mr. Balderson was a CPA for the estate. Both of these letters were provided to the Commissioner of Accounts by the trustee in support of his "Twelfth Account".
8. The trustee also provided the Commissioner with a copy of a page from a "Jean M. OConnell estate tax analysis" which shows $659.97 under "Assets" of that estate as "Debt from Harold OConnell Trust".  A copy of that page is attached as Exhibits 6.
From a review of this information the Commissioner finds that there is no evidence to support an assertion by the trustee that the $659.97 is an asset of the trust. To the contrary, it appears that either it is not a debt at all, or, from the estate's point of view, it was money owed by the trust to the estate, i.e. an asset of the estate of Jean M. OConnell. That estate has been closed for more that six years.
Accordingly, the foregoing Eleventh Account of Anthony M. OConnell, Trustee has been marked a "Final Account" by the undersigned and is hereby approved as a Final Account in the trust under the will of Harold A. OConnell and is filed herewith.
"
(Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson, III, Report to the Judges, in part)


(6) 2000.08.23 Trustee files an Exception to Commission's Report. It contains a copy of the actual Trust 12th account and, for comparison, a copy of the Commissioner's Report of it to the Judges. The Exceptions was accepted by the Court on August 23, 2000, and then it disapperaed. exceptions2000 , exceptions2000-52p

"1. First, I am not accusing Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson, III, or any one else connected with the Court, of any wrongdoing. I simply do not understand why Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson, III, would want to approve and close Accounts before the accountings are fully exposed and the discrepancies addressed. It is against the principals of accounting.
2. Second, the source of the discrepancies are:
Jo Ann Barnes, CPA
Bruner, Kane & McCarthy, Ltd.
700 North Fairfax
Alexandria, VA 22313
Edward White, Attorney
P.O. Box 207
Kinsale, VA 22488
This CPA and lawyer are two principals in the source of the discrepancies that I pointed out in my letter to the Judges of July 24, 2000. The focus should be on the source. To understand how the CPA and lawyer work would require that the Court fully expose their accountings and compel the CPA and lawyer to address the discrepancies. The CPA-lawyer accountings are the evidence for the discrepancies. I ask that this evidence not be covered up.
3. Third, this report protects the source of the discrepancies, the CPA and the lawyer, rather than the public.
4. Fourth, this report covers up, I assume unwittingly, accountings that have never been exposed and their discrepancies addressed.
5. Fifth, this report, by closing the Account for the Trust u/w of H. A. O'Connell, renders Anthony M. O'Connell, Trustee for the [trust] u/w of H. A. O'Connell, helpless.
6. Sixth, this report, by closing the Account for the Trust u/w of H. A. O'Connell, and as explained in the Trust's Twelfth Court Account, renders Anthony M. O'Connell, Trustee for the real estate recorded in B8845 p1444 and B8307 p1446, helpless in the sale of this real estate."
(From the Trustee's Exceptions to the Commissioner's Report, in part)


(7) 2012.03.31 Trustee post his web site http://www.canweconnectthedots.com  to try to expose the accounting and specifically addresses the CPA's 659 entanglement - http://www.canweconnectthedots.com/4d2p/659home.html .

The accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 called debt is the by far simplest example of an accounting entanglement. An accounting entanglement is used as a wedge and takeover tool and as cover. Whoever controls the accounting entanglement controls the people and assets that are entangled. If you can recognize the dynamics in the accounting entanglement 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 you can recognize the same dynamics in the far more complicated accounting entanglements.


(8) 2012.09.04 Trustee sent Summos stating that the Trustee be removed. It is prepared by the law firm of Blankingship & Keith LANKINGSHIP & KEITH and uses our innocent sister Jean Mary Nader O'Connell to sign it.   I am not aware of any "rulings" about the CPA's 659 entanglement. I am aware of the Trustee's 12th account disappearing and the Trustee's Exceptions to the Commissioner's Report disappearing. ruling , ruling16p , timeline , summons , summons10p , summons45p

Summons - Count 11: Removal of Anthony O'Connell as Trustee of the Trust under the Will of Harold A. O'Connell

29. On August 8, 2000, an Eleventh Account for the Harold Trust was approved by the Commissioner of Accounts for the Circuit Court of Fairfax County and determined to be a final account. **

30. Anthony repeatedly and unsuccessfully challenged the Commissioner's determination and requested, inter alia, that the Court and the Commissioner of Accounts investigate a debt of $659.97 that he alleged was owed to the Harold Trust by Mrs. O'Connell's estate. In these proceedings, the Commissioner stated, and the court agreed, that there was no evidence to support Anthony's claims that a debt existed and, if so, that it was an asset of the Harold Trust.***

31. Anthony's repeated and unsuccessful challenges to the rulings of the Commissioner of Accounts and the Circuit Court in connection with the  Eleventh Account , and his persistence in pursuing his unfounded claims to the present day, demonstrate that he is unable to administer the Harold Trust effectively and reliably. ***

32. It is in the best interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust that, upon the sale of the Property, the net sale proceeds be distributed in an orderly and expedient manner. Based on Anthony's actions, he is not the proper individual to fulfill the trustee's duties in administering the Harold Trust.****

33. The removal of Anthony as trustee best serves the interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust."
(From the Summons prepared by the law firm of Blankingship & Keith to replace the Trustee Anthony O'Connell with our innocent sister Jean Mary Nader O'Connell"

* * *

Question: What is the ruling on the following?

The $1,475.97 item was approved by Commissioner Jesse Wilson on October 4, 1993:
"Payable to the Estate of Jean M. O'Connell ... ... ... ... $ 1,475.97" (Trust account at bk480 p1768)

The $816. 00 and the $659.97 items were approved by Commissioner Jesse Wilson on March 20, 1993:
"Int fm Harold O'Connell Trust  ......................................... 816.00 "(Estate account at bk467p191)
"Debt fm Harold O’Connell Trust ...................................... 659.97 "(Estate account at bk467p191)

Reference:
ruling
ruling16p
timeline
summons
summons10p
summons45p

 

(9) 2013.01.25 Judge Smith signs Order approving all the items in the summons but I did not see a copy until April 17, 2014, when the B&K law firm sent me a copy. . (INSERT ORDER. Use date I received it (Look on envelope) and then date of order

(10) 2013.07.03

iB&K law firm informs Anthony O'Connell and Sheila O'Connell that Jean O'Connell Nader has replaced Anthony O'Connell as Trustee: and the Trustee gets to see for the first time the order dated January 25, 1993, that approes all the items in the Summons.

Dear Ms. Shevenell and Mr. O'Connell:
This firm is representing your sister Jean O'Connell Nader in her capacity as Successor Trustee under the Land Trust Agreement dated October 16, 1992.
(From B&K law firm letter of July 3, 2013, to Anthony OConnell and Sheila OConnell)

Reference:
trust-deed7p
Trust-documents41p
B&K5p
B&K2013july3 (This is against the law of contracts)
B&K-judge78p (This is against the law of contracts)

 

(11) 2014.04.17 B&K law firm sends Anthony O'Connell a certified letter enclosing an Order dated January 25. 2013, that approves all the items in the Summons dated September 4, 2012. This is the first time I was able to see the results of the Summons.

(12) 2014.05.09 Judge Smith sends Anthony O'Connell a letter enclosing a copy of the Order dated January 25, 2013.

* * *

Please judge for yourself. Does it look as if the accountant's shut me out because they don't want their accountings exposed? Did they use an innocent family member to carry out their agenda of creating a cover of confusion and conflict and make it appear as if it came from the family? Has the accounting at bk467p191 been concealed since 1993? Have the beneficiares, the Testator's family, our Mother's family, been irreversable destroyed as a family to keep accountings concealed?

(11) (INSERT ORDER. Use date I received it (Look on envelope) and then date of order