Ruling?
The summons says or implies that there has been a Court Ruling about 1,475,97 - 816.00 = 659.97. Has there been a Court Ruling? If so, when was it and what documents show that there has been a Court Ruling? The summons sent to the Trustee says:
"28. Other than its status as beneficiary of the Land Trust, there is no reason for the continuation of the Harold Trust.*
29. On August 8, 2000, an Eleventh Account for the Harold Trust was approved by the Commissioner of Accounts for the Circuit Court of Fairfax County and determined to be a final account. **
30. Anthony repeatedly and unsuccessfully challenged the Commissioner's determination and requested, inter alia, that the Court and the Commissioner of Accounts investigate a debt of $659.97 that he alleged was owed to the Harold Trust by Mrs. O'Connell's estate. In these proceedings, the Commissioner stated, and the court agreed, that there was no evidence to support Anthony's claims that a debt existed and, if so, that it was an asset of the Harold Trust.***
31. Anthony's repeated and unsuccessful challenges to the rulings of the Commissioner of Accounts and the Circuit Court in connection with the Eleventh Account, and his persistence in pursuing his unfounded claims to the present day, demonstrate that he is unable to administer the Harold Trust effectively and reliably. ***
32. It is in the best interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust that, upon the sale of the Property, the net sale proceeds be distributed in an orderly and expedient manner. Based on Anthony's actions, he is not the proper individual to fulfill the trustee's duties in administering the Harold Trust.****
33. The removal of Anthony as trustee best serves the interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust."*****
Comments
Is there some why to expose bk467p191 without the accountants putting the Trustee in conflict with the Court? All of the above would add cover to the accounting trails.
*Why did the Trustee's two Exceptions to the Commissioner's Report, one for the trust and one for the estate, dissappear after they were accepted by the Court? Can we follow their trails?
**The Eleventh Account is the account where the Commissioner of Accountant's changed the Trustee's "This is not a final account" to read "This is a final account". The Commissioner did not initial or date his change. Can we follow the trails to and from this change?
***Has there been a Court Ruling? If so, what documents show that there has been a Court Ruling? What is the justification for putting the Trustee is conflict with the power and prestige of the Court for trying to expose and have recognized the accounting trail 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 that the Commissioner of Accounts had previously approved?
The $1,475.97 item was approved by Jesse Wilson on October 4, 1993:
"Payable to the Estate of Jean M. O'Connell ... ... ... ... $ 1,475.97" (Book 480 page 1768)
The $816. 00 and the $659.97 items were approved by Jesse Wilson on March 20, 1993:
"Int fm Harold O'Connell Trust ......................................... 816.00 "(Book 467 page 192)
"Debt fm Harold O’Connell Trust ...................................... 659.97 "(Book 467 page 192)
****Flag. History suggests that "the net sale proceeds be distributed in an orderly and expedient manner" means the accountants don't want their accounting trails questioned. This is similar to Edward White's letter of November 5, 1993: "I will admit that I am furious about this continual petty harassment. From inception of this estate including the time that his sisters gave him the vehicle and I merely asked for a receipt so that a proper accounting might be filed, Mr. O'Connell has tried one stunt after another to disrupt the flow of administration, notwithstanding my repeated attempts to calm him down".
*****Why is the 1992 deed for Accotink at Bk8307p1445 not recognized? All of the beneficiaries of the Trust u/w of Harold Anthony O'Connell are grantors in this deed. 1992deed7p
"THIS DEED IN TRUST UNDER LAND TRUST AGREEMENT, made this 16th day of October, 1992 by and between JEAN MARY O’CONNELL NADER and HOWARD NADER, husband and wife, SHEILA ANN O' CONNELL and PIERRE SHEVENELL, husband and wife, ANTHONY MINER O’CONNELL, divorced and not remarried, and ANTHONY MINER O’CONNELL, Trustee Under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O’Connell (collectively, “Grantors"); and ANTHONY MINER O’CONNELL, Trustee, of Fairfax County, Virginia (hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as "Trustees" or "Grantees")
W I T N E S S E T H:
That Grantors for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant and convey to the Grantees as trustees the hereinafter described parcel of real estate, situate and being in Fairfax County, Virginia, and being more particularly described on the attached and incorporated EXHIBIT A- ("Property")."
This deed and the assigns gives the Trustee, Anthony Miner O'Connell (not the individual Anthony O'Connell) 100% ownership in fee simple of Accotink. deed-assigns11p Why is the 1992 deed for Accotink not recognization and explaination given? trust-deed-invisible175p It is not prudent to sign a sales contract for Accotink when the deed for Accotink is not recognized, and based on my 1988 sale, the accountants will do a hostile takeover and make proceeds dissappear.
|
